[jimt]

I often wonder when money is tight, and the Parent has to tell the child I'm sorry we can't afford this or that, or mac and cheeze is the meal s for a week, the absent parent wonders why the child doesn't care about them.

The bimbo who was waxing so enthusiastic about her fat checks collected $1800 per month on top of whatever else she received. She'll undoubtedly spend that $345,000 on her son, for sure.

Fathers have an obligation to support their children, without a doubt. But our current feminized "woman takes all" system is grievously unfair.

[FreedomAvatar]

The system is set up in such a way that it's a huge money machine for all the bottom-feeders who populate the CS/Divorce industry. Judges, lawyers, CSEA hacks get kick-backs from the State/Fed gov for each dollar of support they collect.

It's not "about the children". Never has been, never will be.