To: marty60
I often wonder when money is tight, and the Parent has to tell the child I'm sorry we can't afford this or that, or mac and cheeze is the meal s for a week, the absent parent wonders why the child doesn't care about them. The bimbo who was waxing so enthusiastic about her fat checks collected $1800 per month on top of whatever else she received. She'll undoubtedly spend that $345,000 on her son, for sure.
Fathers have an obligation to support their children, without a doubt. But our current feminized "woman takes all" system is grievously unfair.
12 posted on
02/27/2004 7:48:44 AM PST by
jimt
To: jimt
The system is set up in such a way that it's a huge money machine for all the bottom-feeders who populate the CS/Divorce industry. Judges, lawyers, CSEA hacks get kick-backs from the State/Fed gov for each dollar of support they collect.
It's not "about the children". Never has been, never will be.
14 posted on
02/27/2004 7:53:01 AM PST by
FreedomAvatar
(If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson