To: Heatseeker
If the Dems were really that fired up, then why are they not voting in the primaries? So for this cycle, except for NH, they've had less turnout for their primaries than in 2000 and many of those voting in their primaries, in open states, are from Republicans and Independents tweaking their process with votes for Edwards, Dean or Clark.
No, the usual squeaky wheels are fired up.
22 posted on
02/27/2004 1:24:38 AM PST by
Fledermaus
(This Tagline For Rent!)
To: Fledermaus
I think I agree with you. The liberals are "fired" up about one candidate or the other in the primaries. Kerry is now regarded as the "electable" one but so was Clark, then Dean, then Edwards. Dean supporters are already moving to Nader and Clarkies are just sullen. The democrats are so damned mad they are not making rational choices.
To: Fledermaus
Hey, 'maus! Just about to wander off towards the stationary bicycle! Have a good night, pal! :)
30 posted on
02/27/2004 1:31:58 AM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: Fledermaus
If the Dems were really that fired up, then why are they not voting in the primaries? So for this cycle, except for NH, they've had less turnout for their primaries than in 2000 and many of those voting in their primaries, in open states, are from Republicans and Independents tweaking their process with votes for Edwards, Dean or Clark. Can you point me to some documentation on this - I hope you're right. It does not match what the media, including Fox, seem to be saying.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson