[TigersEye]

This does not ban any new ammo - That's KENNEDY's amendment.

Does is it matter who's name is on it?

This is just some BS study wasting my tax money. It's bad, but not as bad as KABA says.

(1) STUDY.--The Attorney General shall conduct a study to determine whether a uniform standard for the uniform testing of projectiles against Body Armor is feasible.

How bad does it have to get for you, Dan? Will the ink have to be dry on a new law that bans it all? How close should we let them get before we say 'enough'?

[Dan from Michigan]

I really don't like things being called a BAN unless it IS A FLAT OUT BAN. We don't need 'the boy who cried wolf' out there. This time KABA is off the mark.

And I never said I liked the study. For the record, I will take that in exchange for the ban on gun lawsuits. Same with the trigger locks(unless the CPSC clause is there - that's a dealbreaker). Those are PITA's. The lawsuits can break the business.

And an ammo ban(Kennedy's), gun show ban through red tape or otherwise, or AW ban will be a dealbreaker for me.