Has Andrew Sullivan been “Brocked” a la David Brock?

self | 02-26-04 | WL-Law

[WL-law]

As someone who was once a daily reader of Andrew Sullivan’s blog, and who had enjoyed his appearances on C-Span and elsewhere de-constructing the errors of the left, I like many find his obsession with gay marriage and his new overall tone unreadable and increasingly detestable.

Based on what I understand about gays and their lifestyle generally, marriage has always been the last thing on the gay man’s minds. As Camille Paglia has noted, male gayness can be described as a state of flight away from mothers, from women, from commitment and middle-class “normalcy”. It’s a state of ‘otherness’.

So – are the proponents of gay marriage being honest about their motives?

Well – let’s look at gay marriage cheerleader #1, Andrew Sullivan.

It turns out that while Sullivan was espousing conservative political values during the last couple of years, some gay activists discovered that Andrew had a dark side that would seem to brand him a “moral hypocrite”, in their calculus.

And so they circulated, in gay chats, what they discovered about Andrew.

Here it is: http://milkyloads.tripod.com/

Yes, it’s as bad as it sounds. If you visit the site, keep the kids away. It will open your eyes, though, to the mendacity of Sullivan’s campaign for gay marriage. The link goes to a gay group site where you’ll find where gay politico’s “outed” Sullivan, and they provide a link to what they discovered: Sullivan’s own posted sex ads, where he trolls for men (not “a man”) for anonymous dangerous unprotected HIV+ passing sex. Andrew posted on various cruising sites for rough 'bareback' sex with strangers.

And Andrew even posted pictures of himself – and trust me, it’s him, all right. Sullivan posted nude pictures of himself (face disguised, and one picture that just shows his ass!) and advertises how buff he is (he specifically mentions his 19" neck) and how horny he is to get it on with all "comers" (that's my pun, not his). It clearly is real, and Sullivan apparently immediately pulled the postings once he was caught "with his pants down" (my pun again). I recently saw him on MSNBC recently and observed the big neck he was advertising -- he's been weightlifting and apparently this is a significant plus factor for him in attracting gay trysts.

At any rate, it's clear that Andrew's lifestyle is about sex with strangers, as many as possible, not about "marriage". And, BTW, Sullivan is HIV+, but fails to mention it on one of the ads. And yet -- he's advertising for unprotected (bareback) anal sex.

“Isn't that just special”, as the church lady would say?

So – it appears that Andrew has decided to fend off one accusation of hypocrisy by adopting a hypocritical position that supports the people who outed him. Got it?! It worked on David Brock, and its working with Andrew Sullivan. He’s now back in the good graces of the gay police, -- but Andrew remains as his our own little "Typhoid Mary" spreading HIV (and poisonoud ideas) while he mounts the pulpit preaching to the American public that gays are wholesome and “just want to be loved”, meaning they just want to get married and live normal monogamous lives.

And now he's a different kind of hypocrite -- one that pretends that gays are actually interested in marriage, whereas he knows that gays are gays because they are running away from monogamy and that a fulfilled gay life is one filled with hundreds of partners, not one partner.

And he’s the #1 case-on-point to prove it.

[Ronly Bonly Jones]

and his new overall tone unreadable and increasingly detestable>>

Given a choice between getting on his knees and receiving the Body of Christ on Sunday, and getting on his knees and receiving the Body of Steve on Saturday, he has chosen option 'b'.

Anathema sit.

[Ronly Bonly Jones]

a fulfilled gay life is one filled with hundreds of partners, not one partner. >>>

There's no such thing as a fulfilled gay life.

[King Black Robe]

If they win marriage then they win everything. No one will be able to discriminate. Their "lifestyle" will received equal treatment in schools and elsewhere. They Boy Scouts will lose their free association argument because gays will be a protected class.

[Old Sarge]

This article just re-validated my decision never to read this fag's site.

[CatoRenasci]

Thanks for posting this. If this stuff is real, and it certainly seems to be from first impression, then AS is a complete hypocrite demanding homosexual marriage while living the promiscuous life-style of the homosexual slut.

I have deleted my links to his site.

[King Black Robe]

Oh yeah....and they will win a windfall in benefits. And who will know that they are having it both ways -- monogamous benefits with polygamous lifestyles? Andrew, when AIDS takes his life, will be about to secure social security tax benefits for another gay person. It will be a huge financial gain to their community and causes. They "marry" another just to give insurance benefits while they have a joint agreement to sleep around.

[keithtoo]

Andrew loses all semblance of rational thought when the subject is 'gayness'. He becomes a blithering lib.

[Petronski]

I am not busting on you, and I will not visit his site. I just have a question: "Andrew Sullivan" is a common enough name--is everyone certain the writer is the slut and vice versa?

[microgood]

Thanks for the post. I hope he gets exposed for what/who he really is.

[mosel-saar-ruwer]

Thursday PM sodomy bump.

[BlueNgold]

Stop that .. you made me spit coke on the keyboard...

[Cinnamon Girl]

What the H are you doing studying gay sites?

[Agnes Heep]

Sullivan is suffering from the same self-loathing that's experienced by all homosexuals, and has a difficult time squaring his need to justify a disgusting habit with what his rational mind knows is right. Hence the contradictory results.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

Don't forget the military. Libs will finally get their wish of destroying it.

[CFC__VRWC]

I have always thought that Sullivan's so-called conservatism had much less to do with any kind of "Damascus road conversion" as it had to do with extending a big middle finger to Howell Raines, Pinch Sulzberger and the New York Times for canning him.

[wardaddy]

Neurosis precedes homosexuality from my observations.

[the Real fifi]

He is a fine writer and a fine mind. At critical times he has been a very important contributor to the debate on foreign affairs and the WOT. This is an issue on which he feels strongly.

I think he is wrong--that in fact Kerry's position is no different and, in any event, we have not seen what Amendment the President will endorse. But he is entitled to state his position without being subject to the opprobrium of terms like "fag" ro comparison to Brock.

[CatoRenasci]

I also think that Sullivan's "conservatism" has a lot to do with his being a Brit who knows very well that the Islamists would cheerfully kill him and every other homosexual they could get their hands on. I think he also had hopes of the Roman Catholic Church being a safe haven for buggerers (quasi-offically, not just in fact as it has been in recent decades).

[buwaya]

Well, there aren't that many of them around (2%?) and most won't marry anyway. A marginal increase in SS at best.