Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tcuoohjohn
That's exactly the point. The medical records were not sought in connection with drug dealing charges. They were sought to investigate doctor shopping charges. When Florida enacted the crime of doctor shopping they enacted a requirement for a subpoena to be issued to gain acces to medical records, which could be challenged by the target, given the sensitivity of medical records.

The ability to challenge the subpoena, or just as importantly limit its scope to relevant information, was denied to Limbaugh and his attorney.
87 posted on 02/26/2004 1:29:46 PM PST by Poodlebrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Poodlebrain
"When Florida enacted the crime of doctor shopping they enacted a requirement for a subpoena to be issued to gain acces to medical records, which could be challenged by the target, given the sensitivity of medical records."

Sounds like case closed to me! Kirshner (and the judge he rode in on) are scum.

88 posted on 02/26/2004 1:38:18 PM PST by safeasthebanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson