[safeasthebanks]

"When Krischer's office circumvented the LAWFUL SUBPOENA process and seized Rush's personal medical records without warning (emphasis added)"

Which part of this sentence did you not understand?

[tcuoohjohn]

There were a very lawful subpoenas in which the SA used standard FRCP rules and a reviewing judge issued five subpoenas four of which were exercised by the SA office.

Will there be anything else?

no?

Thanks..

[tcuoohjohn]

I do find your concept of " warning of subpoena process" amusing. It doesn't exist. Under your theory a criminal suspect must be warned prior to subpoena service in any matter related to criminal investigation.

" Mr. Gotti, you are hereby warned that we intend to subpoena your bank records pursuant to our criminal investigation."

Muwhahahahahaha...