Skip to comments.
Kerry backs state ban on gay marriage
Boston Globe ^
| 2.26.04
Posted on 02/26/2004 12:30:32 AM PST by ambrose
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
1
posted on
02/26/2004 12:30:33 AM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Another Kerry Dodge. TM
2
posted on
02/26/2004 12:31:40 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: ambrose
He specifically opposed a state ban a couple of months/years ago. He warned them not to!! ??
3
posted on
02/26/2004 12:33:01 AM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
To: ambrose
Does John Benidict Kerry ever stick by his principals?
4
posted on
02/26/2004 12:33:03 AM PST
by
Veritas01
(Veritas)
To: Veritas01
He has only one operating principle: say whatever needs to be said to get him elected.
5
posted on
02/26/2004 12:34:01 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
6
posted on
02/26/2004 12:39:21 AM PST
by
ambrose
("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
To: ambrose
TRANSLATION: Kerry is scarred!!!!
It is a convenient position since he can't vote on the subject.
If homosexual marriages happen on May 17. Look for renewed endless videos of homosexuals kissing and prancing. Edwards OR Kerry will be toast if that happens.
Also at that point, the FMA will be pushed up a notch and have reached critical mass. Domas will start to fall "somewhere". Congress will have no choice.
To: ambrose
He can't even decide which nostril to pick.
To: ambrose
So sorry Mr. Kerry, but the people in Texas were opposed to Sodomy and Gommorah until the SCOTUS overturned their will several months ago. The simple solution would be for Congress, of which you are a member, to remove the Federal courts from the authorization to decide cases of a sexual nature from the jurisdiction of the Federal courts and remand them to the states. Congress has this power vested in the Constitution but we don't want to mention this, do we?
9
posted on
02/26/2004 1:00:50 AM PST
by
meenie
To: meenie
It was not just texas affected. The USSC specifically zapped ALL STATES with similar laws. They were not even a party and found out they should have been.
Its a federal issue now. There is NO WAY to hide from that fact. It needs a federal AND, unfortunatly, constitutional solution. period.
To: Torie
11
posted on
02/26/2004 1:31:56 AM PST
by
KQQL
(@)
To: Veritas01
Does John Benidict Kerry ever stick by his principals? Does he have any principals??
12
posted on
02/26/2004 1:35:20 AM PST
by
Mo1
(" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
To: Mo1
He sounds like a liberal moderate. He sits around waiting for a consensus to be formed and then joins it.
13
posted on
02/26/2004 1:37:07 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: longtermmemmory; AntiGuv
14
posted on
02/26/2004 1:37:22 AM PST
by
KQQL
(@)
To: ambrose
I truly think Tuh-Ray-Suh wears the pants in their house. Kerry spent his time waffling and tap dancing around the issue. Tuh-Ray-Suh said Bush's proposal is divisive, now Kerry backs gay marriage.
15
posted on
02/26/2004 1:40:02 AM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: BigSkyFreeper
...at least that's how I see this issue.
16
posted on
02/26/2004 1:40:57 AM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: ambrose
He must be formulating his scripted answer to his plant in the audience.
17
posted on
02/26/2004 1:46:52 AM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: KQQL
It is only one day.
McCain was on pmsnbc and he was saying to still leave it to the states, and let the courts work it out.
This is wrong. It has to be prevented BEFORE the courts rule.
I read here on FR, that DC has a ver large homosexual population working there. I wonder how many of them are working "for" congressional reps?
To: ambrose
ANAGRAM FUN
John Kerry = Horny Jerk
...
His 'position on any subject is laughable.
Kerry is a weathervane.
19
posted on
02/26/2004 2:49:57 AM PST
by
Stallone
(Guess who Al Qaeda wants to be President?)
To: ambrose
Here's what I wrote yesterday, which is kind of funny now because Kerry considered today's postion bigotted.
After the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruling imposing gay marriage against the will of the people and the legislature, John Kerry told reporters on May 5, 2002, I personally believe the court is not right
I don't support marriage. I never have. That's my position. Yesterday, after President Bush announced his support of a Constitution Amendment banning gay marriage, Kerry reiterated that position, "I oppose gay marriage. I also oppose President Bush's attempt to amend the Constitution to ban gay marriage,"
Just exactly how does Kerry oppose gay marriage? Kerry opposes, at least for now, amending the US Constitution. Also, Kerry was one of only 14 Senators who voted against the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1996, which would have banned federal recognition of gay marriage for the purpose of any federal benefits. In his opposition, Kerry went as far as calling the DOMA, "unconstitutional, unprecedented, unnecessary and mean-spirited bill," and compared the law to the 1960s efforts in the south to criminalize interracial marriages.
Kerry has also attacked the federal efforts as an infringement on states rights. However, when Massachusetts tried to act on their own to ban gay marriage in 2002, Kerry signed a letter which stated, "We believe it would be a grave error for Massachusetts to enshrine in our Constitution a provision which would have such a negative effect on so many of our fellow residents."
So, Kerry is on record as believing a ban on gay marriage is not only bigoted and hateful, but is also 'unconstitutional' on the federal level and a grave error on the state level. Just how exactly does Kerry oppose gay marriage, and which reported will be brave enough to ask the tough questions?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson