[GWB00]

Max Cleland is an example of how one man's war record does not add to the candidate's strength when he plays politics with country's security and tries to coddle the Federal employees union over passing a Homeland Security Bill.

The same arguments will be made with Kerrey and he will suffer despite his war record in Vietman, where I think he served(Sarcasm/off)

[bondjamesbond]

By the time the election rolls around, John F. Kerry will still have four months military experience as a LT, thirty years removed, but George W. Bush will have three years military experience as Commander in Chief. Who's military experience is more relevant to this election?

John F. Kerry fought the Communists thirty years ago. A different Republican President finally won that war. Today we are fighting a different enemy in a different war, and this Republican President seems to have a pretty good handle on what needs to be done. But for the last thirty years, John F. Kerry has proved over and over again that he is not up to the job, in every way imaginable. So who's military experience is more relevant to this election?