Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ms12Gauge
There seems to be a problem with this bill, at least to my untrained eye. It denies jurisdiction to the supreme court, and to district courts, regarding government officials expressing official belief in God, but it doesn't appear to deny similar jurisdiction to the circuit courts. So if the 9th Circus rules that the "In God We Trust" on pennies is unconstitutional, their ruling can't be reversed by the supreme court.
9 posted on 02/25/2004 7:00:26 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
My impression of this Bill is that it was a knee jerk response to the complaint about the Mass Judiciary recently, regarding gay marriage. As I said, UNintended Consequences are dangerous, and I believe that this Bill is totally FULL of them. The potential for abuse and MORE not less problems is glaring, to me. I am not an attorney, but I have quite a long history of viewing any legislative measure with an eye for imperfection, and this Bill is NOT going to make things better.
13 posted on 02/25/2004 7:10:15 PM PST by Ms12Gauge (Colorado! Join us to restore your parental rights, and stop CPS from stealing your kids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson