[longtermmemmory]

The judge may have it wrong but they have the authority to get it wrong. When a judge rules agains someone in a civil case, they often have to post a bond during the pendancy of the appeal even if the judge made the wrong decision. The ruling is still enforcable based on the valid authority of the court.

A judge is still the judge even if the decision is wrong. This is about a Supreme Court ruling that has to be erased.

Do nothing and the logic stands, do nothing and the SJC of mass is valid in imposing homosexuality on the public and taxpayers specifically.

[inquest]

The judge may have it wrong but they have the authority to get it wrong.

Rulings contrary to the Constitution are just as invalid as laws contrary to the Constitution. Until we come to that understanding, judicial activism will never be restrained.