[Ms12Gauge]

Websites to surf:

http://www.amatterofjustice.org

http://www.wbflegalreform.com

http://www.constitution.org

http://www.ejfi.org

http://www.falseallegations.com

http://www.massoutrage.com

If I listed all the parents rights groups, I could fill a whole post. The one umbrella org for us all is

www.familyrightsassociation.com AKA "AFRA"

[squarebarb]

All the replies on this matter that I have seen seem very discouraging. They all seem to indicating that impeaching a judge is next to impossible.

The judges are part of the 'law community' and are so out of touch with reality.

Are there any real legal remedies?

[inquest]

Unfortunately our own side is pushing for something that would hand a major victory to judicial activism in the name of fighting against it: the Federal Marriage Amendment. If this goes through, it will be the ultimate surrender to the notion that judges really do have the power to amend the Constitution, since the whole point of the FMA is to amend it "back". If we're going to be successful at defeating judicial lawlessness, then we must not allow ourselves to give in to that notion. We have to acknowledge that the Constitution hasn't changed in the slightest despite their misrepresentations of it, and that therefore continued misrepresentations will not be tolerated, and will be dealt with forcefully.

The actual means which we ultimately decide on are not as important as the conviction we maintain that the judges do not have the power to alter the meaning of the law. That conviction is often the hardest thing to get across to people - sadly, even to conservatives.

[longtermmemmory]

Perhaps the legislature should AUDIT THE LAWSCHOOLS.

Where are these lawyers being educated, or not educated.

Some law schools are private, some are not, most recieve public funding, most have some intern program conected to the public institutions (courts).

Law schools are vulnerable to exorcising the commie infestation.

[CyberAnt]

Right now, this is distracting. There is an election going on. First, we have to get President Bush re-elected. Then we have to make sure that we maintain the Senate, and hopefully add enough senators in order to allow the President's nominee's to be confirmed.

ONCE THAT HAPPENS .. then is the time for this judicial housecleaning. But .. the way things are stacked now, I just don't see much chance of getting anywhere with this.

And .. if you'll put my name somewhere on your list, I would love to help you work on this maybe a year from now.

[4LegalReform]

It is remarkable how the judicial branch was able to sneak in absolute judicial immunity and later indoctrinate the majority of the legal community into believing that this is an acceptable doctrine within our Constitutional framework of law. I have had law professors getting indignant upon my criticizing of absolute judicial immunity as patently unconstitutional and that only by accepting vicarious liability can our government legitimately shield judges
from suits for damages.

A good discussion on a related subject, the Right to Petition and how this right is inconsistent with the judge-made immunities may be found in a law review article, "How the Judiciary Stole the Right to Petition". 31UWLA Law Rev. 257, or, for an Internet copy, go to
www.constitution.org/abus/wolfgram/ptnright.doc or .htm for the .doc and html versions respectively.

Jacob Roginsky, Ph.D, President
A Matter of Justice Coalition
www.amatterofjustice.org