Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nov3
"That is what is called a non-sequitor. People who have exhausted their options use that in an argument."

I asked because I want to make a point. When you joined, you took an oath to defend the country, etc. Right? If you did not do that, who is to blame? You or the citizens?

"It sure seems like a lot of people that have been here for years are disagreeing with you"

Really? All I see is you, shooter and magnus. That is not a lot. I have fought more on my own.
273 posted on 02/26/2004 10:44:11 AM PST by looscnnn (Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]


To: looscnnn
Answer a question for me that I posted earlier. It is not a non-sequitor. "Perhaps you can clue me in on when the NRA has taken a shot at another gun group - other than returning fire?" You alleged they had several times.

I asked because I want to make a point. When you joined, you took an oath to defend the country, etc. Right? If you did not do that, who is to blame? You or the citizens?

It is still my job. Still. I work and give money for it. Good luck and I anxiously await your answer.

274 posted on 02/26/2004 10:58:08 AM PST by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]

To: looscnnn; Nov3
-- they have to earn my respect by defending the CONSTITUTION like they say they will. Your not holding them responsible just gives them a pass and tells them that it is ok to not do their sworn duty. I asked because I want to make a point.
When you joined, you took an oath to defend the country, etc. Right? If you did not do that, who is to blame? You or the citizens?
-looscnnn-


______________________________________



"It sure seems like a lot of people that have been here for years are disagreeing with you"
-nov3-


______________________________________



Lots of FR people that have been here for years are in favor of assault weapons bans..
Strange, -- but true, -- because they blindly support politicians and movements that claim 'community standards' backed by a majority vote can 'regulate' property by prohibiting possession..

The fact that such prohibitions are unconstitutional never quite seems to sink in..
Pretty weird types of conservatives, imo.
277 posted on 02/26/2004 12:11:15 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson