If you would vote for nader you are a pretty sick person IMHO. The last Democratic president got over 3,000 americans killed on 9/11. we simply can't, as a nation, take the chance on anyone other than Bush occupying the White House next year, even if it means we aren't entirely happy with his positions on some issues. I'm willing to put up with the AWB if that is what it takes to keep the white house in republican hands and expand our control of the congress so that we can appoint conservative judges.
Ok I am going to combine your logic with m1-lightning
You protest vote got us the assault weapon ban in the first place. Remember when Bush SR. raised taxes and all the conseratives went apesh** and didn't vote to re-elect him? Instead, we got 8 years of liberalism. Now Bush is not right wing enough and you want another 8 years? To prove what? That we are better off with more lieral laws and judges?
My vote and other conservative votes are directly responsible for killing 3,000 Americans. Please! Consequently I could say that it was Bush SR's fault that 3,000 Americans perished because he raised taxes. At this point we are practicing butterfly theory.
They say that something as small as a butterfly beating its wings in China can cause a hurricane in America, so maybe we should go to China and kill all the butterflies, just to be safe. --Ken Advent
If you want to protest against Bush, do it in the primary election.
Ok fine. When do you draw the line. At what point does the mean balance the outcome. Who is to judge?