Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: coloradan
The standard for deadly threat that merits deadly force sure seems a lot different for these cops than for the rest of us.

You know, I hate police abuse an brutality as much as the next guy. The LAPD really makes some questionable calls sometimes. I know, I live here.

But, then I scolled back up to this.

"Killinger, armed with a knife, is suspected of tying up the gas station attendant and stealing $180 from the register, authorities said. Killinger was convicted in 2003 for assault with a deadly weapon, court records show. "

And then, I stop and think. What did the LAPD do? They took a dangerous many off the street and save the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of dollars to deal with this individual.

As much as I hate to admit it ... some people just get what that deserve.

When they are wrong, I call them on it ... but I just can't get upset at the LAPD for this one. Soceity was protected and served here.

45 posted on 02/25/2004 9:41:03 AM PST by Stu Cohen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Stu Cohen
When they are wrong, I call them on it ... but I just can't get upset at the LAPD for this one. Soceity was protected and served here.

I'm not shedding a tear for the loss of the perp, but I am concerned about the precedent set. Suppose a cop pulls someone over for speeding, and after pulling over, the driver, nervously, puts the car in reverse instead of neutral for a split second, which means the reverse lights come on and the cop, behind, sees this. Should this become a textbook deadly force situation?

56 posted on 02/25/2004 10:19:10 AM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson