No, it's not. Here are your words:
Boxer's Child safety locks REQUIRED on all guns amendment.
Oops, not quite. According to the amendment, gun dealers will have to supply all guns they sell with a lock. No big deal, as NIB guns come with one anyway. And I don't have to keep my guns locked up, but if I do, I "shall be entitled to immunity from a qualified civil liability action." Oooo, that EEEEvil Barbara Boxer (along with all those EEEEvil Republicans) just granted me immunity - how dare they.
BZZZT! Wrong again. We would not be required to use a locking device.
BS. You shoulda heard what Boxer just added to it. They gave away half the farm on that one.
Half of who's farm to who? Again, I now have a way (which I never did before) to gain immunity from civil liability. Who wins and who looses? Little Johnny "Off-his-meds" Prozak takes a hammer and chistle to your gun lock, takes your gun, shoots up a school, and YOU HAVE IMMUNITY.
You got the first sentence right, but the next two sentences are both wrong. AGAIN.
Bullsh*t Shooter. We were sold out by at least 20 Republicans.
Sold out. By 20 Republicans. Who gave us immunity from civil liability. Get a grip.
And here we go with the bashing of not only the Republicans - who didn't sell you out - but of Republican supporters who aren't so quick to condemn (unlike you) before all the evidence is in.
Well the rest is just more of the same uninformed Republican and Republican supporter bashing.
At least we are clear which side you are on. I qualified quite a few of those statements, which you conventiently left out.
A locked front door on my house, hell... just OWNING a house and the private property Rights that go with it, should be enough to make me immune from the actions of some theif. But you apparently APPROVE of a gun lock requirement which actually increases my liability. Thanks, but no thanks.