Savage: Homosexual activists like Marxists

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, February 25, 2004

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Mike Savage gets it. Some people don't like his style, he's kind of sharp and so on. But he gets it.

Let me know if you want on/off this ping list. A very busy one of late.

[Tailgunner Joe]

bttt

[skip_intro]

You've confused the CA Supreme Court with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The CA Supreme Court is actually quite conservative, as these things go. We removed most of the radicals years ago.

[DMZFrank]

The marriage amendment should not be necessary. These actions by SF's mayor and the Massachutsetts judiciary are lawless and unconstitutional. We simply cannot amend the constitution every time the left decides to disregard it. We need to hold these officials accountable through impeachment, recall, nullification, interposition and arrest where necessary.

I am so seek of this endless deference to judicial tyranny.

When oh when will some elected executive officer in some state or federal capacity, in fulfilling his constitutional duty to honestly interpet the constitution (federal or state) just disregard the unconstitutional rulings of any court and dare the legislature to impeach him for it? When will some legislature impeach just ONE judge for an unconstitutional ruling?

To say that the courts have the final word on the constitutionality of a law NO MATTER WHAT THEY RULE is to say that the system of checks and balances envisioned by the founders does not exist any more.

Alan Keyes gave the best summation of this issue that I've heard yet. He said that every branch of government has a duty to honestly interpret the constitution. If the president honestly feels the courts make an unconstitutional and lawless ruling, then the president should disregard that ruling and refuse to enforce the provisions that he felt were blatantly unconstitutional. If the Congress felt the president was wrong in this decision, then it was their duty to impeach him for it. If the electorate felt that the Congress was wrong for impeaching the president or the failure to impeach him, they can remove them at the next election, as well as the president for any presidential actions that they considered wrongful.

Lest anyone consider this formula has a recipe for chaos, then I submit to you there is no chaos worse than an unchecked oligarchic Judiciary. We are not living under the rule of law when judges make law up to suit their whims has they engage in objective based adjudication.

[sport]

"The marriage amendment should not be necessary. These actions by SF's mayor and the Massachutsetts judiciary are lawless and unconstitutional......"
posted on 02/25/2004 7:21:25 PM PST by DMZFrank

You are correct. All that needs to be done is for the Legislative Branch to re-assert their authority as a co-equal partner.

I gurantee you that if a mayor stated handing out concealed carry licenses to all comers he/she would be stopped posthaste.