To: kattracks
I'm still trying to find Rev 13:20. From what Bible is this?
At least we know that Adam wasn't a white Southern man. Have you ever tried to take a rib from a white Southerner?
16 posted on
02/24/2004 10:15:59 PM PST by
abishai
To: abishai
Yeah, I can't find it either (looking at a Bible recommended by a good Catholic when I asked him for one that avoids recent revisionism).
It goes straight from 13:18 to 14:1. I assume yours is the same?
Very interesting if true...
Qwinn
24 posted on
02/24/2004 10:19:49 PM PST by
Qwinn
To: abishai
LMAO at your joke.
Very good!
60 posted on
02/24/2004 10:39:06 PM PST by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: abishai
ROFL
To: abishai; 4ConservativeJustices; billbears; TomServo
At least we know that Adam wasn't a white Southern man. Have you ever tried to take a rib from a white Southerner?Good one, abishai
To: abishai; All
The word ADAM means "man of red mud or red clay". So the first man was a red man?
Whp knows...but for you scientists and wanna bees out there, consider the science in God making man out of red dust or clay. All the basic elements are there and....considering that IRON forms the basic building block in the oxygen carrying ability of hemeglobin as well as the coloring agent of RED CLAY, one can begin to fancy the notion that well yes, Intelligent Design can certainly be behind the fashioning of man...in the very least...from the very RED DUST of the ground!
Clever of God to use rust in the creation of our blood and marrow systems!
To: abishai
I'm still trying to find Rev 13:20. From what Bible is this? You just did more work on the article than the reporter.
175 posted on
02/25/2004 8:27:20 AM PST by
thackney
(Life is Fragile, Handle with Prayer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson