To: AreaMan
It means that without enforceable patents, no technical advances can be sustained. Imagine a world where drug companies have significantly diminished incentives to develop new drugs because they cannot keep the rewards of their R&D?
5 posted on
02/24/2004 4:38:57 PM PST by
RKV
(He who has the guns makes the rules.)
To: RKV
It means that without enforceable patents, no technical advances can be sustained.Agreed.
I would like those patents be developed here in America.
7 posted on
02/24/2004 4:45:41 PM PST by
AreaMan
To: RKV
It means that without enforceable patents, no technical advances can be sustained. Sorry, but that is nuts.
Change it to "no company that patents technology can be sustained by it" and you would be right. The technology itself marches on, regardless of what country performs the advances.
9 posted on
02/24/2004 4:54:28 PM PST by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: RKV
It means that without enforceable patents, no technical advances can be sustained. Imagine a world where drug companies have significantly diminished incentives to develop new drugs because they cannot keep the rewards of their R&D? A point that I wish more people understood.
But how come other countries pay so little for the drugs they get form the American drug companies? We're lucky there not screwing us as badly as they alraedy are
See how long you'd be able to run a drug company if pharmacists living in other parts of the world copied your drug formulas because they refused to pay the going drug rates.
23 posted on
02/24/2004 6:23:14 PM PST by
LowCountryJoe
(Shameless way to get you to view my FR homepage)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson