[Rutles4Ever]

I think Zell Miller would disagree with your assessment that there is no morality among democrats.

Whether or not the majority of democrats hold a moral view on social issues does not supercede the right of somebody to give money to the political party of their choice. My comparison of the Hollywood "loon-arati" with a hypothetical stance of refusing to pay taxes if Kerry is elected is a valid comparison to refusing to shop somewhere because an individual exercised his rights outside the realm of the corporation. If you had read my posts, you would see that I do not excuse corporations that donate in their corporate name. You would also know that I am not a RAT apologist, just a defender of your rights and mine.

If the shoe were on the other foot -- if Democrats decided to organize a boycott against Domino's pizza because Tom Monaghan is an ardent private supporter of pro-life organizations, you would be screaming bloody murder about over-reaction, rights, and disregard for the Constitution.

Consistency of message and mission has to be our edge over the democrats.

[Paulus Invictus]

Gosh, I never said anything about boycotts or the possibility that individual RATS like Zell could be morally clean. All I asked you is some examples of how the RAT Party policies and ideology can be proven to be moral or based upon morality as we undersstand it.