To: international american
Due to your tag line, I have to ask you this question......
On dimpled chads or punch ballots, how come they don't fingerprint each one in contested intent?
If there are no fingerprints, it was bulk produced and someone needs to look deeper.
65 posted on
02/24/2004 11:20:55 AM PST by
blackdog
(I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
To: blackdog
Great question, which you answered yourself.
"If there are no fingerprints, it was bulk produced and someone needs to look deeper."
To: blackdog
On dimpled chads or punch ballots, how come they don't fingerprint each one in contested intent?
Two reasons.
First, it's harder to lift prints than TV and the movies make it look, and the odds of getting a complete - or even a usable partial - are relatively small.
Second, so what if fingerprints show up? The ballots don't feed themselves into the vote-counting machine; someone has to feed them, and probably not wearing gloves while so doing.
152 posted on
02/25/2004 3:00:33 PM PST by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson