Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mwl1
Nearly a year after Musgrave stuck her neck out? A year!
96 posted on 02/24/2004 7:52:00 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative
You are truly an ass
102 posted on 02/24/2004 7:53:34 AM PST by MJY1288 (There's no leaders on the path of least resistance, ask John Kerry, he's been paving it for 32 yrs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Civil rights legislation and proposed constitutional amendments were discussed for years in the late 1950s and early 1960s before Kennedy and Johnson put the force of their office behind federal legislation.

It is far better that this issue not have to be solved by amending the constitution. These asinine judges, however, have made that approach impossible, so their jurisdiction must be reigned in.

I think the President has been superb on this issue.
112 posted on 02/24/2004 7:55:15 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative
This is not directed solely at you but I have to say this:

OH GET OFF IT ALREADY! Yes, Musgrave introduced the amendment "A YEAR AGO!" but, for the last year all we have heard is "BUSH MUST BACK THE AMENDMENT !!! BUSH MUST BACK THE AMENDMENT!! WAH WAH WAH "

Now that he has, the argument changes "HE's just a follower, he's just a follwer WAH WAH WAH"

The fact is HE IS NOW PUBLICLY PUTTING THE POWER OF THE OVAL OFFUICE BEHIND THIS AMENDMENT!!!!! so STFU ALREADY!

113 posted on 02/24/2004 7:55:52 AM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Nearly a year after Musgrave stuck her neck out? A year!

If you are trying to imply that it's equivalent for an obscure Congressional Representative and the President of the United States to make public proposals to ban gay marriage with a constitutional amendment you are politically naive or intentionally ignoring the truth of the situation.

218 posted on 02/24/2004 8:26:09 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative
My word, but you have your bowels in an uproar! During the 2000 campaign, the President said that he did not favor gay marriage. He has never retreated from this stand.

Musgrave stuck her neck out? Yes... and so did the President.

303 posted on 02/24/2004 8:56:16 AM PST by carton253 (I have no genius at seeming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson