Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Imal
There is no way I will ever support monkeying with the Constitution for issues like this that clearly should be decided by the states.
The Constitutional amendment is required to make it an issue to be decided by the states. The way things are right now with the wording of the Constitution, if one state sanctifies a marriage, all other states are bound by the Constitution to recognize the marriage.

The proposed amendment prevents that and puts it back to the states, where it belongs. The amendment is perfectly in line with your stated desire, while the status quo is not.

85 posted on 02/24/2004 7:48:48 AM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley
Which wording are you referring to?
115 posted on 02/24/2004 7:56:20 AM PST by Imal (Ironically, there really is a vast, right-wing conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson