To: GraniteStateConservative
He's a leader by coming out in favor of an amendment he didn't author and that was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary nearly one year ago on May 21st, 2003? Sounds like a follower. Musgrave is the leader.What the hell is the matter with you? Get off it, will ya?
83 posted on
02/24/2004 7:48:02 AM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: sinkspur
Exactly. If conservatives, who previously have criticized the president over his actions, continue to criticize this latest effort, then they prove they will never be content, no matter what the administration does.
To: sinkspur
So, you can't think of anything substantive to counter my argument?
OK, I'll declare victory.
94 posted on
02/24/2004 7:51:18 AM PST by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: sinkspur
Sink, this action this morning is exactly what I hoped I'd see when I snapped at you so abruptly on a thread on this topic a few weeks ago (remember?). I don't think authorship is relevant here...only standing foursquare behind the amendment.
He has laid it on the line on this issue, and I think for him it is a winner. As far as 'civil unions,' we'll see how that plays out. I'm not sure where I stand on that yet.
109 posted on
02/24/2004 7:53:59 AM PST by
Petronski
(John Kerry looks like . . . like . . . weakness.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson