You posted the following remark in #597:
And the ones who replied to me about the "pandering" remark didn't seem to think I was coming out against CMA.
Your contention was incorrect - at a minimum I thought your remarks were coming out against CMA. If you make an assertion that's inaccurate, I'm afraid I have little choice but to reply in order to correct the record. I'm not about to "skip over" your post when I see a blatantly false statement in it.
That is because you are looking for something to jump my ass about; for some reason, you've taken it upon yourself to correct every single thing I say, like some kind of school marm.
I never said ONE WORD about CMA -- not one -- and even you haven't been able to post where I said anything about it -- only what you "think" or "assume."
Your interpretation is a blatant lie.