I strongly dissent from the notion that those that think that one adult committed to another desiring to seal the bond in marriage, who are not within the strictures of cansanguinity, is "Orwellian." I strongly dissent from that. Orwell was all about the issue of killing off the human spirit for self realization in favor of some impersonal state goals, achieved by evil ends. The analogy is inapposite and tendentious. I also strongly dissent from the notion that this issue should be loaded in process for one side or the other. That is a recipe for toxicity in the public square, as we have seen over and over again. Give democracy a chance. I think Americans overall by and large make intelligent choices over time. I am generally amazed at their good judgment.
|
Yep. But you have succeeded in moving slightly in favor of opposing it, because I am so irritated. No doubt I will in time remove this exchange from the equation. I still find the term "Orwellian" offensive, and will continue to do so in any event. The term is not conducive to calm debate.
In the religious sphere, define it anyway you want. I don't care.