Replies

If homosexuals want to change current law, let them be the ones to propose a constitutional amendment to allow it.

Ahh I see, the old head in the sand approach. Gotcha.

Let's just ignore Gavin newsom and the 3700 Gay couples in San Francisco. After all, they haven't introduced an amendment.

Let's just ignore the Massachusett's Supreme Court and thier edict ordering the Mass Legislature to pass a law allowing gay marraige. After all, they haven't introduced an amendment.

While we are at it, let's just ignore Al Quida. After all, they haven't attacked America in 3 years. Let's just ignore Iran and N. Korea. After all, they haven't set off a nuke yet.

The Massachussetts Supreme Court should be slapped into next week by the legislative branch of that state. The Judicial CANNOT tell the Legislative branch to pass an amendment(which is what they want them to do). If there is discrimination, the Supreme Court can find the marriage laws unconstitutional, but they didn't. Once the amendment process is opened, the war on America begins.....

The District Atty of SF should be prosecuting the ones responsible for gay marriages, and those being married. If not, he should be fired until someone does do their job.

Bush simply has to go on TV and say, there is NO discrimination against gays. They can marry anyone they want of the opposite sex. They are the ones that want the laws changed, let them do the grunt work. If there is an amendment, it will take many years, and peoples ideas will change. So how many thousands will be married before it is ratified??? We need someone with the guts to stand, not pass this off to a process, that is what Bush is doing....passing the buck to others.