To: Carry_Okie; backhoe; farmfriend
Unfortunately, the EPA has lost all credibility and now when something like this actually may have some merit, everyone immediately digs in their heels and are skeptical.
Short fiber asbestos is nothing to fool with and it does occur naturally in the ultra mafic rocks of the California foothills. The problem the EPA faces is that the stuff is everywhere...what will they do, make everyone move??
To: Cuttnhorse
EPA faces is that the stuff is everywhere...what will they do, make everyone move?? They'll do what they were destined to do...stop growth and restrict room additions, pools or anything else that could possibly disturb the soil.
7 posted on
02/24/2004 8:33:25 AM PST by
lewislynn
(The successful globalist employee will be the best educated, working for the lowest possible wage.)
To: Cuttnhorse
Short fiber asbestos is nothing to fool with and it does occur naturally in the ultra mafic rocks of the California foothills. The problem the EPA faces is that the stuff is everywhere...what will they do, make everyone move?? Here's a clue: It's not legitimately EPA's problem. If the owners choose to purchase and use land bearing an inherent risk of asbestos exposure, don't you think that's their right as long as they own the consequences? Heck, we might actually learn that the whole problem was overblown (an outcome EPA could never allow). Of course, there is probably enough forensic and statistical data available in El Dorado County to make that case incontravertably.
My bet is that some of the residents may well be forced to move, as part and participal to the environmentally destructive real estate and resource racketeering scam that civic environmentalism has largely become.
8 posted on
02/24/2004 8:39:10 AM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson