Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DentsRun
Turan also wrote, "This notion, sometimes called blood libel or blood guilt, has led to untold suffering and death over hundreds and hundreds of years, and should have given someone, even a believer, pause."

My understanding is that the term "blood libel" refers to bogus charges starting around the 12th century that Jews drank the blood of children in secret rituals. "Blood libels" against the Jews, thoroughly reprehensible in their own right, are not about the cruxifiction of Jesus.

116 posted on 02/24/2004 10:02:58 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: beckett
My understanding is that the term "blood libel" refers to bogus charges starting around the 12th century that Jews drank the blood of children in secret rituals.

That's always been my understanding as well. There was a discussion of this in the media about six or eight months ago when Egyptian papers started talking about Jews supposedly killing children to use their blood in making matzo dough. That's one reason I was surprised to see some critics of Gibson's film use the term blood libel to refer to the "may his blood be upon us" line from the Gospels.

117 posted on 02/25/2004 12:55:41 AM PST by DentsRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson