Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FBD
You left out a critical sentence.
"In presenting Plaintiff's Program, defendants sought to critically examine the quality of plaintiff's "Public Access" television show."
Once again, The Daily Show was parodying/criticizing the work they were copying. I don't believe they would have been able to use other copyrighted materials in their parody/criticism of "The $andy Kane Comedy Show." e.g. they could not have played Frank Sinatra (a more palettable example than Eminem) in the background without permission from the copyright owner.
207 posted on 02/24/2004 11:08:25 AM PST by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: Your Nightmare
palettable = palatable
208 posted on 02/24/2004 11:10:37 AM PST by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

To: Your Nightmare
You could be right.
However, there does appear to be some (Plenty of)gray area in"fair use" , regarding this.

209 posted on 02/24/2004 11:20:40 AM PST by FBD (...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson