Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TADSLOS; Pukin Dog
May I ask your opinions on the Apache? Was not such copters designed to ambush Russian tank columns in Germany from tree covers and they were not meant to function as offensive insertion weapons? That their mission was transformed from defensivce to offensive after the end of the cold war? The Russian never used copters for offensive capabilities in Afghanistan - only to transport troops with protection.
158 posted on 02/23/2004 9:04:55 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Destro
Was not such copters designed to ambush Russian tank columns in Germany from tree covers and they were not meant to function as offensive insertion weapons?

Both. The requirement to field the AH-64 was to counter the threat of Warsaw Pact and North Korean armored formations both in the close fight and deep as a counter attack force against 2nd echelon forces.

That their mission was transformed from defensivce to offensive after the end of the cold war?

The entire Army changed course during the height of the Cold War from the Active Defense to Airland Battle. The advent of the Apache was just a small part of that transformation. Other ground systems came into being, such as the M1 Abrams, M2/3 Bradley and MLRS, thanks primarily to Reagan's defense buildup during the early eighties. The Airland Battle concept was played out extensively with Brigade sized formations against a replicate Warsaw Pact opposing force (OPFOR) on the desert floor of Fort Irwin, CA. This concept proved itself during Desert Storm and has been modified over time to the warfighting doctrine used today(and still evolving).

The Russian never used copters for offensive capabilities in Afghanistan - only to transport troops with protection.

Not true. The Soviets used their Mi-24 Hinds extensively in Afghanistan as close air support and overhead protection for ground forces.

166 posted on 02/24/2004 6:44:44 AM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson