To: Howlin; onyx
PING
2 posted on
02/23/2004 6:54:41 AM PST by
Mo1
(" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
To: wcdukenfield; holdonnow
Great read, Thanks for posting it
4 posted on
02/23/2004 7:02:14 AM PST by
MJY1288
(There's no leaders on the path of least resistance, ask John Kerry, he's been paving it for 32 yrs.)
To: wcdukenfield
Ding, ding, ding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5 posted on
02/23/2004 7:06:54 AM PST by
DoctorMichael
(Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
To: wcdukenfield
Bttt
6 posted on
02/23/2004 7:11:40 AM PST by
firewalk
To: wcdukenfield
It's about time that we took the gloves off...where's the 21st Century version of Lee Atwater...we really need him.
7 posted on
02/23/2004 7:16:20 AM PST by
MarkDel
To: wcdukenfield
hear, hear, Dr Levin
To: wcdukenfield
The President has always maintained that he had no problem with the Democrats making "political" attacks on him. What he failed to appreciate is that the "political" attacks were never just about Mr. Bush. The Democrats' attacks also diminished the accomplishments of our soldiers, questioned the operational and tactical decisions of our commanders in the field (remember the "quagmire" and "flak vest" controversies), and were clearly an attempt to demoralize our troops and drive a wedge between them and their Commander in Chief for partisan gain. Along with a lot of other bogus presumptions and "conventional wisdom", the "New Tone" should have gone with the wind post-9/11. During WW II, FDR would have chewed up and spat out the Republicans if they had behaved as disgracefully as the Democrats have behaved in the War on Terror.
To: wcdukenfield; holdonnow
Isn't Bush best when expectations are lowered? Was the Meet the Press interview political gamesmanship revving the left up for their ultimate demise?
The Bush/Rove political strategies are either brilliant or inept. I happen to believe the former to be the case. The campaign is a long process.
15 posted on
02/23/2004 7:37:11 AM PST by
marktuoni
(This space reserved for pithy comments...as yet I have none.)
To: wcdukenfield
I am all for the president presenting his case to the public. As a practical matter, though, I don't think we should do anything to weaken Kerry until he has the nomination in the bag, and its too late for anyone else to come forward.
Kerry is too perfect an opponent, we don't want to mess this up for ourselves by shooting back too soon. Taking Kerry apart, and watching him implode, is going to be too much fun to miss. I want to be able to savor the moment.
16 posted on
02/23/2004 7:58:41 AM PST by
marron
To: wcdukenfield; livius
17 posted on
02/23/2004 8:04:57 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
To: William Wallace
**PING**
18 posted on
02/23/2004 8:06:44 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
To: wcdukenfield
President Bush has done more in three short years to liberate and defend Muslims the world over than any former president, any foreign leader, or any Muslim leader. Nobody cares. Iraq will not be a positive for Bush in the election, you're fooling yourself if you think it will be. By the time the election rolls around it may well be a disaster.
25 posted on
02/23/2004 12:11:42 PM PST by
jordan8
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson