Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New technology offers vivid photo of fetus
The Salinas Californian ^ | By DAVE NORDSTRAND

Posted on 02/22/2004 6:31:26 PM PST by miltonim

Edited on 05/07/2004 5:46:43 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Parents-to-be Laura and Scott Cot

(Excerpt) Read more at californianonline.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 4d; ge; prenataldevelopment; prolife; technology; unborn


Scott and Alicia Stirling-Julian's 3D photograph of their unborn baby using new computer software. The Stirling-Julians are from Pacific Grove




Scott and Laura Coté get a 3D ultrasound of their baby Monday by technician Mary Quizon at First Sight on Romie Lane in Salinas.




A traditional ultrasound of a baby.
1 posted on 02/22/2004 6:31:27 PM PST by miltonim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: miltonim
I wonder if there would be any takers if this could be made mobile and drove from one abortion clinic to another for free?
2 posted on 02/22/2004 6:39:35 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
That's an interesting idea. Of course, most cities would deny the business permit or find another reason to ban the mobile imaging system. I know, you said free, but they would come back that it is a medical practice and requires permits.
3 posted on 02/22/2004 6:48:52 PM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
You just saw a doctor say it was entertainment:'). My question really was though, would it do any good? Would women refuse because they don't want to know?
4 posted on 02/22/2004 6:52:43 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
I wonder if there would be any takers if this could be made mobile and drove from one abortion clinic to another for free?

Many people just don't care. In the year 2004, most already know full well what they are doing.
5 posted on 02/22/2004 6:57:35 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
Would women refuse because they don't want to know?

The City Attorney would still be the show stopper in most places, but one approach in an area that would permit it: State you are conducting a research study and offer a cash payment for participation. It would probably be best to lease a storefront near the abortion clinic and set it up there. The real bad thing is if they decided to get the abortion anyone and used the payment to get it.

6 posted on 02/22/2004 7:05:23 PM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: miltonim
Perhaps the infanticide laws should require both parents to have such photos and have them for 24 hours, bring them back in tact no earlier than 24 hours later before an infanticide would be done.
7 posted on 02/22/2004 7:06:31 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
anyone=anyway
8 posted on 02/22/2004 7:10:13 PM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
The hags who wish to propogate the lies would refuse to see and learn. Those who wish to understand will embrace the new technology.
9 posted on 02/22/2004 7:16:51 PM PST by Maigrey (Kerry is the epitome of Bipartisanship - He's on both sides of every issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
This will also be a benefit for the younger generations, who are accustomed to newer technology.

And, these same people will be the ones whose parents did want them, and this will continue.

10 posted on 02/22/2004 7:18:34 PM PST by Maigrey (Kerry is the epitome of Bipartisanship - He's on both sides of every issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BearWash; All
My daughter had this done. She is older (38) first baby and the doctor was worried) The clinic wanted her to have amniocentesis to see if the baby had spinal bifida or another genetic disorder. My question to my daughter was: "If your child has a problem what will you do? And amniocentesis can be risky."

Her answer: "This is our baby whatever is going on we will not abort this child."

They elected not to have amniocentesis but were excited to see their son. His name is Wyatt. He's due tomorrow.
11 posted on 02/22/2004 7:19:45 PM PST by Not gonna take it anymore (". . . stability cannot be purchased at the expense of liberty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Not gonna take it anymore
Congratulations to your daughter!

My step daughter just found out she is pregnant also.

12 posted on 02/22/2004 7:21:42 PM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
Congrats on your new grandchild!
13 posted on 02/22/2004 8:00:24 PM PST by Not gonna take it anymore (". . . stability cannot be purchased at the expense of liberty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
These 3D photo's should be put up on bilboards nearby abortion clinics, reading:

"Name: Jane, Doe
Age: 33 Weeks
Gender: Female
Eyes: Blue
Hair: Blonde

Killed by CHOICE"


14 posted on 02/22/2004 8:42:32 PM PST by Phisher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson