Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: H2dude
"only sex with children and animals is not OK, IMHO"

says who???, 30 yrs ago someone would have written that sex with children, animals or members of the same sex is not ok. Obviously gays are going to live together as couples but why do they have a need to have society say that what they do is ok? Answer, because they have a massive need to feel accepted due to their unholiness and non belief in Jesus. They want acceptance from society so they can feel good about themselves. And society, without God as the umpire, is falling foul of the whining about this and many other issues and changing the societies morays and in history every society that has debased Gods morals has disappeared into oblivion. This is the beginning of the end and society as well as individuals should not condone these things. Love them all the more but do not condone their sin or anyones sin for that matter.

24 posted on 02/22/2004 5:34:35 PM PST by helives (God bless Australia, God bless America, God bless Israel, God bless western civilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: helives; H2dude; GrandMoM
"only sex with children and animals is not OK, IMHO"

says who???, 30 yrs ago someone would have written that sex with children, animals or members of the same sex is not ok...


An excerpt from: American Psychiatric Association Symposium Debates Whether Pedophilia, Gender-Identity Disorder, Sexual Sadism Should Remain Mental Illnesses

On Monday, May 19th, 2003 in San Francisco, at a symposium hosted by the American Psychiatric Association, several long-recognized categories of mental illness were discussed for possible removal from the upcoming edition of the psychiatric manual of mental disorders.

Among the mental illnesses being debated in the symposium at the APA's annual convention were all the paraphilias--which include pedophilia, exhibitionism, fetishism, transvestism, voyeurism, and sadomasochism...

Earlier, in the December 2002 issue of a prestigious journal, the Archives of Sexual Behavior, Moser--along with several other prominent mental-health experts--argued in favor of de-pathologizing pedophilia. Some of the commentators writing in that issue said that there is little or no proof that sex with adults is harmful to minors. Another mental-health expert argued that society should not discriminate against adults who are attracted to children--noting that many beloved authors and public figures throughout history have been high-functioning individuals who could actually be classified as pedophiles.

"Any sexual interest," Moser concluded in his Archives commentary, "can be healthy and life-enhancing..."

"People with Paraphilic Sexual Interests Suffer Like Homosexuals Did Before the 1973 Decision..."


If they can succeed in removing pedophilia from the DSM, they can claim their perversion is as "normal" as homosexuality. Then they won't hesitate to ask the question. Or insist that the age of consent be lowered.

( Documentation: The APA's Removal of Homosexuality from the DSM )

94 posted on 02/23/2004 6:24:56 AM PST by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson