Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
So far I've found this: #90

And this:

On May 16, 1996, Adm. Jeremy Michael Boorda, the chief of naval operations, committed suicide. Newsweek had planned to confront Boorda that day with evidence that he had worn two valor medals that he had not earned. Hackworth had tipped Newsweek off to the story; Hackworth had been tipped off by Roger Charles, an old friend who writes for the National Security News Service. On the surface, Hackworth seemed the perfect person to expose Boorda's lie. Hackworth is, after all, "America's most decorated living soldier." Who better to judge Boorda's false claims of valor?

And judge Hackworth did. Before Boorda's body was cold, Hackworth was thundering about military honor and the soldier's code. In Newsweek, he declared that "[t]here is no greater disgrace" than wearing unearned valor medals. In his newspaper column, he announced that Boorda's deception threatened the bedrock integrity of the armed forces:

And this:

Rules on "V" pins less clear in Vietnam era

Boorda might have been apprehensive because one of the Newsweek reporters working on the story was Retired Col. David Hackworth. Hackworth's exposé last year on Air Force Gen. Joseph Ashy resulted in a congressional investigation into an expensive military flight the general took with an aide and his cat.

But Ashy survived the probe, and many in the Navy believe that Boorda would have survived an investigation.

While rules governing the awarding of combat "Vs" are very clear now, they were not so clear when Boorda was a young lieutenant in Vietnam.

The rules in 1965 stated simply that "V" pins were authorized for "direct participation in combat operations." Also, Boorda's combat operations citations implied that he was qualified to wear the medals.

Retired Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, who was chief of naval operations during the Vietnam War, said he believed Boorda was "completely entitled" to wear the pins.

Zumwalt said on the CNN program "Larry King Live" that paperwork sometimes did not indicate the V, even though it was authorized. He said he routinely authorized the wearing of the combat "V" pin for Vietnam combat veterans.

"That was my intention as an operational commander, and I believe that is the judgment that should prevail," Zumwalt said. "It is a bureaucratic distinction to say, 'Well, it wasn't in the citation.'"

Boorda stopped wearing the combat "Vs" once they were questioned, but many think he could have successfully argued that wearing them was no mistake or, at worst, an innocent one.

From "The Arlington National Cemetery website" -

Updated Information: June 25, 1998

Boorda's Disputed Awards Were Proper, Admiral Says Navy Secretary Amends File of Late CNO Thursday, June 25, 1998

Navy Secretary John H. Dalton placed in Boorda's file a recent letter from Elmo Zumwalt Jr., the chief of naval operations during the Vietnam War, that asserts it was "appropriate, justified and proper" for Boorda to attach the small bronze combat V's to the ribbons on his uniform.

After being advised in 1995 by the Navy's Office of Awards and Special Projects that he was not entitled to the decorations, Boorda had removed the V's from his uniform.

"Admiral Mike Boorda's citations for awards of the Navy Achievement Medal and Navy Commendation Medal plainly state they were awarded for service including 'combat operations' and 'while operating in combat missions,' " Dalton's memo said. "Further, Admiral E.R. Zumwalt, Jr. USN (Retired), who served both as commander, US Naval Forces, Vietnam, and Chief of Naval Operations, has said that Admiral Boorda was entitled to wear the combat distinguishing device. I am making this information a matter of official Navy record."

Navy Secretary John Dalton says only a Navy board can determine whether Admiral Jeremy "Mike'' Boorda, who committed suicide two years ago, had the right to wear decorations for valor from the Vietnam War.

The only official way of changing Boorda's record is for someone to request the Board of Corrections of the Naval Records to review the awards, he said. Typically, such a request is made by a family member, but he said no request has been made in Boorda's case.


388 posted on 02/23/2004 8:21:54 AM PST by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
Thanks for the info. I think Zumwalt and Dalton were just trying to be kind to the family of a man who had served his country honorably and just committed suicide. I served as a naval officer for almost 8 years (1965-72). If the citation did not contain authorization to wear the "V" device, a person was not authorized to wear it. Boorda knew better, which is why he stopped wearing them once they were questioned. A sad story, but not worth taking your life over. I am sure there were other pressures and not just this issue, which caused Boorda to take his life.

The point I was trying to make is that anyone can wear medals, but you really can't tell whether they are legit until you see the service record. Kerry refuses to release his military records. Why?

391 posted on 02/23/2004 8:45:02 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson