But don't you see a real inconsistency here? When it comes to John Kerry's medals and release, it was legitimate because the military allowed it, end of story. Yet the military can be second guessed by everybody on President Bush's honorable discharge? If you're going to take the line "what the military authority says, goes," then you have to apply the same rule to President Bush. Since the Kerry camp has demanded a "double check" on the military's decisions re. President Bush, why not the same for Senator Kerry? It seems to me that Senator Kerry and his minions have set the precedent for questioning military service, discharge, conduct of duty, etc. Why should his records be protected from the same scrutiny he demands of President Bush?