[FairOpinion]

"In terms of Bush, you'll get no argument from me. "

==

Good.

The only reason I started to post on this thread at all, because of the news report posted, that during the Kaloogian rally "GOP loyalists booed President Bush". I thought that was totally unacceptable, and said so, which caused a horde of so-called conservatives to decend upon me and full attack gear.

[Poohbah]

The only reason I started to post on this thread at all, because of the news report posted, that during the Kaloogian rally "GOP loyalists booed President Bush". I thought that was totally unacceptable, and said so, which caused a horde of so-called conservatives to decend upon me and full attack gear.

Same thing happened to me. There's gonna be a ZOTEX sometime this summer.

[GOP_1900AD]

Personally I would not have booed, and agree that it was not called for. But in turn, let's not automatically label anyone who questions the Bush policies, in a more gentlemanly fashion than booing or attack dog style epithets, as a traitor, liberal, Communist or fascist. Don't you think that at least *some* of those who are frustrated with Bush might be good old party faithful, and therefore, folks whose "voice of the customer" data needs to be collected? The end goal is GOP effectiveness and an unambiguous distinction of the rightist position. Elsewhere, I've seen descriptions of the notion that we will lose any "bidding war" with the Left on topics of socialized government "entitlements." Correct! We *must* be a clear alternative, not a "me too but going there more slowly."