Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
With meth it comes down to two choices. Who do you want dead? The dealers or the idiots, so weak they use it? Execute the dealers and cookers and the users will decline in numbers.

Kill off the supply and the suppliers.
48 posted on 02/22/2004 8:17:55 AM PST by dennisw (“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: dennisw
Supply and demand with addictive drugs can be misleading. It sounds easy to say eliminate the demand and the supply will go away --- but with addiction, the supply has to exist first --- there is no demand when people haven't first become addicted.
51 posted on 02/22/2004 8:22:54 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw
Kill off the supply and the suppliers.

Sumary executions, or billion dollar investments in death row facilities and maintenance?

56 posted on 02/22/2004 8:41:32 AM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw
Teddy Kennedy should go to the next State of the Union on meth, instead of alcohol.
64 posted on 02/22/2004 9:05:09 AM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw
Who do you want dead? The dealers or the idiots, so weak they use it?

I sometimes think the solution is a voluntary quarantine. Just open a junkie ranch -- a legal reservation in a mild climate that offered pup tents, free food (nothing fancy; military rations would do) and unlimited drugs of your choice. Most of the users would kill themselves pretty quickly, but that's their business and it would clear the streets of the dead end cases. Any outsider who wanted to do reclamation work could open the mission of his choice, and any user who wanted to leave could do so after testing clean in a rigorous program lasting at least a year.

88 posted on 02/22/2004 5:12:53 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw
He he, supply side economics at it's finest. :)
106 posted on 02/23/2004 7:51:17 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw
If your solution to the drug war and our problem with methamphetamines is to kill dealers because that will stop the desire of people to do meth, let me offer you some advice.

1- please take a simple class in economics. Supply depends on demand, without a demand the supply will dry up, and if there is a demand there will always be people to supply. This is a fact of life and killing people won't change this simple economic law.

2- please take a history class, because we have been attacking the war on drugs from the supply side for about 30 years now and the problem keeps getting worse.

3- get some common sense because you seem to want to repeat failed policies over and over again, that's called idiocy.

Meth is dangerous, and there are solutions, but not the same "solutions" we have been trying for years which have only made the problem worse.
157 posted on 02/25/2004 11:25:44 AM PST by bc2 (http://thinkforyourself.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson