Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fresh Wind
"Anyone who would claim that meth is a harmless recreational drug, to be equated with pot, or is OK because "doctors prescribe it", is full of ****."

I assume this remark is directed at me, because I'm the only one on this thread to bring up the fact that meth used to be legally prescribed by doctors.

Nowhere in my post did I say meth was OK when it was legally prescribed. All I said was the legal version of meth was a lot safer than the homemade poison being made now. And there were a lot less addicts.

34 posted on 02/22/2004 7:17:07 AM PST by Vigilantcitizen (W'04 Herman Cain for Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilantcitizen
All I said was the legal version of meth was a lot safer than the homemade poison being made now. And there were a lot less addicts.

I believe when it was prescribed it was called crosstops. Small white pills. They were outlawed along with many other pharmy drugs that were popular in the 60's and 70's.

I am sure to get flamed for this but I believe drugs were "safer" when made and controlled by the drugstore. Now it seems the kids have their choice between crank or crack. Both are many times worse then the pharmy drugs that people use to use to change their reality.

I have seen the damage meth has done to a few people. I am sure it is the work of satan.

170 posted on 09/24/2004 1:09:08 PM PDT by winodog (JFK is a double minded man, unstable in all his ways)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson