To: longtermmemmory
There was at least one article on FR in the last couple of days about the judge being homosexual. He had a name that looked Navajo, and he looked Indian (American style) in a photo.
The sick thing is that judges in CA must recuse themselves from any case involving homosexuals if they are members of the notorious homophobic Boy Scouts of America. Everyone should be aware of this.
A homosexual judge can preside over momentous cases such as this "gay" marriage crap, but a judge who is a member of BSA must not. In fact, they tried to fire all the judges in CA who were members of the BSA, but watered it down to recusal.
Anyone interested in nice 5 acres near the CA/OR border? Freepmail me, I'm serious.
91 posted on
02/21/2004 11:26:48 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
To: little jeremiah
can you please back that up with links to legal or news records?
I am in an ongoing flamewar on another site on the gaymarriage subject, and my opponents swear this has nothing to do with using the government to hammer the mainstream into toeing the line drawn by homosexual agitators. I think it does, and any concrete proof that it HAS BEEN SUCH would be very VERY useful.
Thanks!
122 posted on
02/21/2004 11:34:16 PM PST by
King Prout
(I am coming to think that the tree of liberty is presently dying of thirst.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson