Web site aims at Cheney's gay daughter

AP ^ | 2/21/04 | AP

[Unam Sanctam]

Perhaps she has her own views that don't happen to coincide with those of the gay activist totalitarians. Like with the blacks, liberals want all members of favored "victim" groups to march in lockstep.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

That is exactly what I mean. When she is out campaigning for mommy or daddy, (not just working in the back ground but actively campaigning) you can say what you like. Until then there is no need to be cruel.

Besides few of us are raving beauties and even fewer of us were that way at thirteen.

[longtermmemmory]

On a similar point. Have you noticed how diane sawyer tired to attack gibson's love for his father. Could it be, though a lesbian and a disagreement with with father, she still cares for her father and does not want to hurt him.

What if Cheney runs for president?

[jocon307]

"This is beneath contempt.."

Yes, it is.

[netmilsmom]

>>"Please help us and other people of the same lifestyle to live just as freely as your father," one letter writer from Kansas said. <<

PLEASE! make the choice that her father did. Find a nice person of the opposite sex and marry for life. Stop getting your jollies with your same sex pal, Letterwriter from Kansas.

[Steve Eisenberg]

I would not support GWB on a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.

Very tough issue. I think it is wisest to treat heterosexuality as the norm and gays as a tolerated minority, but this is an increasingly hard sell, even to young conservatives. As phrased, I think that the federal marriage amendment would, in the somewhat unlikely event it passed, be like prohibition. It would get repealed.

Better idea would be an amendment which merely forbids judges from forcing one state to recognize another state's same sex or polygamous marriage. Easier to pass and, I think, less likely to get repealed. Sadly, it would mean that liberals would, more than today, gravitate towards liberal states and conservatives towards conservative ones. But it is probably happenning anyway.

As for Mary Cheney, her embarrassing her Dad would not lose him any votes IMHO.

[montag813]

here's the picture USA today added.

Right...they throw this tripe out there but somehow didn't find the Kerry-Fonda protest photo relevant.

[mountaineer]

A tolerant and enlightened comment from another leftwing site:

Here's the deal folks; little Mary is a lesbian taking $100,000 a year to help re-elect her father, who supports a ban on gay marriage. She takes the money from people who hate who hate what she does, but act nice to her to curry favor with daddy. sounds very sick to me. what bizarre family values these repubs have!! Most people who take $100,000 a year from an organization which promotes hatred of the very person getting $100,000 would be thought of as either prostitutes or mentally ill. which is it, Mary???

Posted by straight and sick of Bush/Cheney at February 19, 2004 02:07 AM link

[bannie]

beneath contempt

Signs of a despirate loser.

[thesummerwind]

The truth is that most intelligent, wise thinking gays are not in favor of gay marriage.

[Tribune7]

That's pretty mean.

[Devil_Anse]

Who elected Mary Cheney?

If she is to be put on the hot seat, the least they could do is elect her to some high office. That's the perk given to most of the other people who are being publicly grilled on this issue.

If Mary Cheney is to be forced to be a political pawn, why not any other private citizen as well?

[onedoug]

Ask Al Rantel or Tammy Bruce.