I agree. However, if he is caught, the Democrats will say he wasn't much of a threat anymore because he was boxed in, and they will start pointing at North Korea as being the real danger to America.
I say we'd better be careful not to execute him.
You say that as if it's a bad thing.
Saddam... check. Osama... check. Ill...check please. :)
It doesn't matter what they say -- they have pat responses for any eventuality. If we find Saddam's WMD they'll either suggest the administration had them (or knew where they were) all along and was merely waiting for the politically expedient opportunity to present them to the electorate, or they'll say that Saddam posed no threat to us even with those weapons and the loss off American lives wasn't worth the trouble (and cost) of the war. And they'll say that we willfully ignored other much hotter spots - like No. Korea, as you mentioned - just so that Dubya could take care of a personal vendetta on Saddam ......and to make an oil grab for Cheney's good buddies at Halliburton, of course.
In regard to bin Laden, the Rats will drone on and on about how we would've doubtlessly caught him a long time ago had the President devoted our resources to doing so (rather than concentrating solely on his revenge mission in Iraq).
Luckily most Americans won't buy their BS.
Dems after his capture: Bush was wrong in making bin laden central to the war on terror. Even with his capture we still have the terrorist threat which only Democrats can counter.