Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Patriot1998
Remember the "horrible" interview Bush did a couple weeks ago? Most memorable thing in that interview was when Bush was asked whether they knew where Bin Laden was. For the FIRST time, Bush ducked that question.

Astute observers like FR would have immediately suspected that Bush did, indeed, know where Bin Laden was, and that he was surrounded.
23 posted on 02/21/2004 9:01:26 AM PST by fqued (GW - Go West, young man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fqued
Most memorable thing in that interview was when Bush was asked whether they knew where Bin Laden was. For the FIRST time, Bush ducked that question.

Yup! I noticed that, too! The President told Timmy ~~ "I'm not going to answer that".

Dare we hope?!

59 posted on 02/21/2004 9:12:35 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: fqued
President Bush Declines Question on Bin Laden Whereabouts
67 posted on 02/21/2004 9:14:25 AM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: fqued
There have been several articles lately about the U.S. preparing for a major spring offensive in that area. We are waiting for better weather.

It would be important for the snow storms and blowing wind to stop to give our aircraft the ability to see what they are shooting at.

Many of our 'smart bombs' are laser guided and need a laser nearby on the ground to point out the target. It would be very hard for one of our special forces to be grounded there all alone without support at this time.

I wonder if one or more of our satellites that are tracking him could be augmmented by one that is fitted with a laser spotter at some time in the future. It seems that if we can track him from the air, we should also be able to 'SPOT' him as well.

We have lasers that are able to hit the moon from the earth, so aiming from low orbit to hit a target on earth should be possible as well.

I suspect that a targeting laser would not require more power than a satellite could provide since the targeting is a seldom used option of relatively low power. It would be easier to implement a trageting laser onboard a satellite than a pulse energy weapon which would require much greater energy.
133 posted on 02/21/2004 9:42:50 AM PST by dglang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson