To: torchthemummy
This has no relationship to civil disobedience. This is an ELECTED civil servant bureaucrat (in other words the GOVERNMENT) refusing to follow or carry out the law, not a civilian disobeying the law.
115 posted on
02/20/2004 9:14:51 PM PST by
tertiary01
(Learn from history or it will be repeated until you do.)
To: tertiary01
I wondered about that today; what made that lady in New Mexico just up and decide to start breaking the law.
116 posted on
02/20/2004 9:15:51 PM PST by
Howlin
(A Loyal Member of EggsAckley's Troll Patrol)
To: tertiary01
True. And unlike most of us, this person has taken an oath of office that they most likely violated.
121 posted on
02/20/2004 9:21:37 PM PST by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
To: tertiary01
"This has no relationship to civil disobedience. This is an ELECTED civil servant bureaucrat (in other words the GOVERNMENT) refusing to follow or carry out the law, not a civilian disobeying the law.'
Absolutely! As I indicated, they think this is civil disobedience aka. the sixties, but of course the fact is this steps ups to criminal acts by officials sworn to uphold the CA constitution. I'd be a little more concise but I'm enjoying my dinner while keeping up with the posts.
124 posted on
02/20/2004 9:30:25 PM PST by
torchthemummy
(Great Liars Need To Have Great Memories)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson