Let's try this.
Two thousand years from now, if Messiah Jesus still tarries at the right hand of the Father (Psalm 110:1), historians are going over the records written during the late nineties.
And the Poison Pills conclude that the accounts of the Clinton impeachment are all wrong, totally unreliable.
Why? Because these future "historians" practice the same blind, historically revisionistic arrogance you are hiding behind.
They say,
"No, no, it never could have gone this way. The Consitution requires removal of a President for high crimes and misdemeanors. The records show that this president committed perjury, he abused the powers of his office to suborn perjury and cover up his crimes, he disgraced his office in an atrocious manner. Good heavens, he even bombed foreign countries just to manipulate the headlines! It is simply impossible that he would have been allowed to remain in office!"Further, the Senate is required to try such cases. The documents allege that the Senate did no such thing, but that it held a mock trial consisting of some abbreviated thoughts, with, no evidence, no cross-examination, no serious chance to consider the weight of the matter. They are depicted as shirking their office, their Constitutional responsibility — and we are supposed to believe that it was the opposing political party that agreed to this! Incredible! It could not have happened thiw way!
"Hence, the records are all wrong! We're sure of it!"
And of course it is these come-lately Poison Pillian revisionists who would be wrong.
So you take your blind-faith revisionism, and I'll stick with the facts and the eyewitness testimony.
In your quiet moments, though, do you ever wonder why you find the facts so threatening, why denial over this massive crime is so comforting to you?
You really should.