To: Jeff Gordon
Uh, no one is really pointing at her and saying "See! She is pro-life!" -SHE- is the one saying it, over and over and over. She's speaking for herself. She didn't do that in 1973. In 1973, they put words in her mouth. Hell, if I remember correctly even then she didn't actually have the abortion. That's my point.
Perhaps we're defining being "used as a pawn" differently.
By your definition, it seems to me like any spokesman for any cause would qualify as a pawn.
Qwinn
31 posted on
02/20/2004 7:49:32 PM PST by
Qwinn
To: Qwinn
"Hell, if I remember correctly even then she didn't actually have the abortion. That's my point."The Roe vs. Wade decision didn't come down until after her daughter was born. Still, the millions of aborted babies because of it has to weigh heavy on her heart.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson