Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Gordon
Uh, no one is really pointing at her and saying "See! She is pro-life!" -SHE- is the one saying it, over and over and over. She's speaking for herself. She didn't do that in 1973. In 1973, they put words in her mouth. Hell, if I remember correctly even then she didn't actually have the abortion. That's my point.

Perhaps we're defining being "used as a pawn" differently.

By your definition, it seems to me like any spokesman for any cause would qualify as a pawn.

Qwinn
31 posted on 02/20/2004 7:49:32 PM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Qwinn
"Hell, if I remember correctly even then she didn't actually have the abortion. That's my point."

The Roe vs. Wade decision didn't come down until after her daughter was born. Still, the millions of aborted babies because of it has to weigh heavy on her heart.

42 posted on 02/20/2004 9:33:12 PM PST by SwinneySwitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson