To: rightcoast
This was published in paper funded by a public university? I'll be surprised they haven't aready strung this kid up the diversity flag pole.
4 posted on
02/20/2004 11:38:08 AM PST by
Callahan
To: Callahan
This was published in paper funded by a public university? I'll be surprised they haven't aready strung this kid up the diversity flag pole.
You will notice that this particular "public university" is a "technical" one. These types of university generally attract those instructors and students who insist on logic, facts and "practical" results. Hence, if you are going to see any place where (and, admittedly, it may difficult) the practical considerations are held in esteem, it will be a places such as these.
To: Callahan
This was published in paper funded by a public university?MIT is a private school.
21 posted on
02/20/2004 12:24:19 PM PST by
heleny
(No on propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
To: Callahan
It's starting. The TECH here is obsessed with gay marriage. The editorial board said that the Supreme Court should affirm the SJC. For 9 months the paper has been pushing for all things gay. Every single week there's another pro-gay marriage article and no balance. Rarely does a pro-family values letter or editorial get printed and when it does. Its bashed 3 times over in the next issue. Today's issue contained a brave letter that superbly twisted this gay obsessed columnists pro-gay marriage article to support the amendment as well as a rebuttal to Adam's article that misreprehented.
To: Callahan
My records describe MIT as a private institution.
34 posted on
02/20/2004 3:26:43 PM PST by
Chris Talk
(What Earth now is, Mars once was. What Mars now is, Earth will become.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson