To: Kieri; All
This is not necessarily good news. It wll likely inspire more leftist voters to flock to the polls...
and vote for Democrat candidates for Senate and House.
Bush should be elected in a landslide, Nader or not.
224 posted on
02/20/2004 2:17:46 PM PST by
unspun
(The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
To: unspun
This is not necessarily good news. It will likely inspire more leftist voters to flock to the polls Yep. This is the significant downside of a Nader candidacy. He'll contribute to the demise of the Rat nominee, but he'll bring kooks in who will probably vote Rat down the ticket.
I think it's obvious Ralphie waiting to see what happened to Dean. If Dean had done better, I bet Ralphie would've sat on the sidelines.
226 posted on
02/20/2004 2:22:16 PM PST by
Credo
To: unspun
Nader strikes me as triangulation. This puts Nader on the far left, Bush on the Right and Kerry somewhere inbetween middle.
This is too convenient for kerry when he is trying make his move to the middle. BTW he should not have to make a move to the middle. That should be exposed as more kerry lying.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson