Posted on 02/20/2004 6:14:56 AM PST by MarcoPolo
WASHINGTON - American officials say U.S. forces will be needed in Iraq long after a sovereign government is restored this summer, but they have yet to work out the terms of a continued presence.
The U.S. administrator in Iraq, Paul Bremer, has also urged Italy and other countries to keep their troops in the country at least until December 2005, an Italian newspaper reported on Friday.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
BUT, I'm betting they will be out of Iraq before we're out of Yugoslavia.

I would be very surprised if we had any more than a division in Iraq by 2006. We are downsizing to 70K by the end of this year, as well we should.
We do not need huge formations in Iraq to conduct counterterrorist operations and black ops in Syria, Saudi, Jordan, and Iran.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
BUT, I'm betting they will be out of Iraq before we're out of Yugoslavia.
Sadly you are probably right and that is foolish. People should take out their Risk boards and take a look -- Where are the most dangerious places on the Globe? We have bases in two strategic places -- Iraq & Afghanistan. If there's going to be more trouble, better there than here.
The Eye (aka Rick Kaplan) is personally overseeing things now for the Democrat National Conmittee. ;-)
Worldwide List of Military Installations (.pdf format)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.