[Travis McGee]

What arguements would then be? And how would the same arguements NOT hold for polygamous marriages, or father/daughter or father/son or brother/brother marriages? Please explain how 3% of the population can demand that 5,000 years of civilization may be overturned to fit THEIR preferred perversion, but not the other?

Please give a detaile, logical answer FOR homo "marriage," but AGAINST the other cases?

What homohubris to declare "MY perversion is normal and worthy of marriage, but YOUR perversion is NOT!"

[abraxas_sandiego]

the argument is that it's unconstitutional to deny someone a LEGAL right based on their race, sex, etc...if 2 hetero people can get married, then in all probability, it's unconstitutional to say that two gays can't. your argument about father/son marriages has zero bearing or applicability...it's not a LEGAL option for ANYONE.

[Jeff Head]

I wonder how quickly the governor and the federal authorities would arrest this man and his cohorts if they started handing our counterfeit money on the steps of city hall...stating it was just as good as the real thing and that the people had a right to it.

My guess is that it would last all of a few hours at most.

Yet that is precisely the type of thing they are doing. Devaluing and ruining the currecny of real marriage by passing out counterfeits. And, IMHO, thr results will be far mor damaging and far reaching than those of counterfeit money if it is not stopped.

[Canticle_of_Deborah]

What homohubris to declare "MY perversion is normal and worthy of marriage, but YOUR perversion is NOT!"

bump!

[AdamSelene235]

And how would the same arguements NOT hold for polygamous marriages, or father/daughter or father/son or brother/brother marriages

Er, the arguement does hold for these practices.

Hold to your hat, we could end up miles from here.