To: Destro
Ok, I'll go along with that---but why take the step (purely political) of passing a LAW that you know will be overturned when you can use that time and effort to pass an AMENDMENT that cannot be?
36 posted on
02/19/2004 10:36:17 AM PST by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrack of news.)
To: LS
that you know will be overturned I do not agree with that. I think it would not be- in any case win - win.
40 posted on
02/19/2004 10:41:35 AM PST by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: LS
you can use that time and effort to pass an AMENDMENT that cannot be?
[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Now, what were you saying about amendments?
62 posted on
02/19/2004 11:15:47 AM PST by
Gorjus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson